How does one simplify an inequality like ?
First, we break it up into and
.
Then, we draw a number line diagram (try to do it!) and take the intersection between or
and .
Finally, we obtain or
.
An inequality may involve rational expressions. In such a case, it is a good practice to exclude certain solutions at the start. For example, consider . We will remind ourselves, in writing, that
.
Deducing the solution of another inequality that looks similar to the previous one often gets a student stuck. The approach is to make use of a suitable substitution for the variable (say ). Let's look at some common substitutions below:
Question asked by a forumer:

Response:

Checking process: Verify that the inequality is indeed satisfied if one takes any value greater than 10.5.
Some questions require the student to complete the square of some expression and then apply the result to solve an inequality.
Let's consider a simple example: Show, without the use of a calculator, that is always positive for all real values of x. Hence, solve the inequality
.
Firstly, we have , so the expression is always positive for all
(shown).
Next, , as a result of multiplying both sides by
.
By the earlier result, we can conclude that . We drop the equality sign because
, since it occurs as a denominator in the original inequality.
Finally, the solution is .
Thus, we see that the act of completing a square has the effect of simplifying an inequality. Do learn this practical strategy well.
A student asked me this question: Solve .
Now what is interesting about this problem is that it does not specify which method is to be used to solve the inequality. Thus the student has to decide between the graphical and the algebraic method, or he/she will get stumped by the question, not knowing what to do, in the worst situation.
In this case, the graphical method is more suitable than the algebraic method. If we take the algebraic approach, we will have to deal with and
in the expression, leading to complications. Let's go into details of the graphical method.
First, we note that , so we can cross-multiply to give us
which simplifies to
. We will then sketch the graphs of
and
, from which the points of intersection may be found easily.
We shall now look at several variations of this question. Consider this variation: Solve .
First, we observe that both numerator and denominator are positive, so we can cross-multiply and solve it via the algebraic approach, i.e..
Consider another variation: Solve .
This may be solved with both methods. In the graphical approach, cross-multiplication and simplification will lead us to . One will find that both graphs do not intersect at all.
In the algebraic method, we shall apply the substitution , leading to the following steps:
,
from which we can conclude that (and therefore
and thus
) has no real roots because the discriminant
.
Finally, I leave you to ponder on this problem: Solve .